Thursday, October 15th, 2009

Cincinnati: Vote No on 9

I don’t have any personal connection to Cincinnati, so perhaps it’s not appropriate to take a position on a ballot initiative there. But I think the matter is relevant to a broader geography, and people can judge for themselves if they find my position compelling or not.

Issue 9 is the so called “streetcar initiative”. It is a proposed amendment to the city charter of Cincinnati that would require voter approval prior to spending any funds on any rail project of any type. It is being pushed by a coalition that is trying to stop a streetcar plan, though the initiative is more broad than just that. It would require a vote for any funding of any rail transit of any type. Also, it should be noted that Cincinnati previously did put a regional transit levy up for a vote to build a light rail system, and it was defeated.

The pro-Issue 9 camp is making the simple argument of “let the people vote”. It’s intuitively compelling. COAST, an anti-tax group that is one of the principal backers of the ballot initiative, has a pretty good track record of getting these sorts of things passed. So it does seem pretty clear that voters have been at odds with elected officials and leaders on many of these issues. And, I’ve said myself that the pro-streetcar marketing has not measured up to that on the anti-streetcar side.

Still, I don’t think this initiative is the right way to go. That’s for a few reasons:

  1. Direct democracy, though appealing in principle, has generally proven otherwise outside of relatively small, homogeneous communities. Athens was Exhibit A in this. Direct democracy was a disaster there, which is why our Founding Fathers chose a very different system. California is proving today that government by voter initiative is a recipe for ruin. Elected officials eventually find themselves so hamstrung by an accumulation of these initiatives that effective governance becomes impossible. The Chief Justice of the California Supreme Court recently criticized this very thing, saying that the ease of ballot initiatives in California has “rendered our state government dysfunctional”. While politicians are perhaps too easily co-opted by interest groups, the same has proven true of voter initiatives in California, which are often backed by huge special interest money. No doubt originally the initiative process was used for ostensibly good government purposes, but it has gone in directions its proponents could not have imagined. COAST may yet regret the Pandora’s Box it is opening with this.
  2. Constitutional documents such as city charters should deal with structural matters of government and general powers and duties, not micro-managing policy. Transportation is a clear and legitimate power of local government everywhere. Even COAST implicitly recognizes this. It certainly does not, for example, demand a voter referendum before any money is spent to fix potholes. It’s trying to use a bazooka to kill a gnat.
  3. The city of Cincinnati has to start building a differentiated product offering for its urban core in order to attract business and residents. I’m all in favor of low costs and low taxes, but that’s the only program COAST offers. In the case of the city of Cincinnati, with large legacy costs and other associated elements of being the core city, such as higher crime and worse schools than suburban jurisdictions, Cincinnati is structurally a high cost producer. It will never be able to compete in the market solely on costs. Costs are important, but they aren’t the only factor. Perhaps COAST has an alternative strategy to streetcars, but if so, I haven’t heard one. Organizations that exist simply to oppose things without any positive vision of what they want to achieve deserve a skeptical eye.

My view: Vote “No” on Issue 9.

I noted the pro-streetcar people had not gotten the job done on the marketing front. That is starting to change. I’ve seen some better materials of late. I’m not sure if the message is getting out, but the collateral is MUCH better. I’ll put a few videos below to give a sample. Some of these could prove very useful for other cities.

Here’s a brief 30 second spot with reasons to vote against Issue 9:

Here is just a really, really impressive video of various facts about the streetcar proposal. Any city looking to market transit should do something like this:

I’m not sure how effective this one will be, but it is kind of funny:

For those of you who would like to explore the streetcar matter in more detail, here are a couple of additional longer form videos. Note that I do not endorse the entire contents of these videos.

More Cincinnati

The Great Streetcar Debate
Cincinnati: A Midwest Conundrum
Agenda 360

Topics: Transportation
Cities: Cincinnati

6 Responses to “Cincinnati: Vote No on 9”

  1. 5chw4r7z says:

    Thanks for giving us an outsider's objective view.
    Some times, it seems we're preaching to the choir so its nice to know (as if we didn't already) that someone outside looking with no stake in it thinks Issue #9 is a very bad deal.

    The message is slowly getting out, some of the most conservative anti-streetcar people I know on the west-side have stated Issue #9 is a bad way of going about defeating the streetcar.

  2. Anonymous says:

    I would say issue # 9 sounds like a bad idea, and I would hate it if that existed in Chicago. I agree with TU on a local government needing flexibility for things like transportation.

    As it relates to street cars, I don't like them and think they are a bad idea. They create more maintenance and all that rail needs to be maintained as well as all the electrical lines which would be required and frankly ugly to look it draped everywhere. subways are my vote, out of sight, keep the lines of the cities clean.

  3. Anonymous says:

    Interesting. Although California is the posterchild for referenda dysfunction, is anyone aware of other municipal or state governments that have gorged themselves on the buffet of government by ballot box (with similar results)?

  4. Randy Simes says:

    You hit on the key points relating to this particular issue. The problem is more with the approach and the style of government it creates than anything else. More red tape, dysfunctional operations and singling out one particular form of transportation just doesn't make sense.

  5. Anonymous no. 2 says:

    Coming from a nonprofit advertising and marketing perspective, I would love to see better communications efforts on the part of the pro-streetcar movement. I don’t currently live in Cincinnati, but having seen the videos posted, I wish I could tell those responsible for them to simplify and slow down their messages. Especially the first video – there might have been great insights in that ad, but there were too many too quick. I personally didn’t take anything away from it. The streetcar initiative is a really important issue for many concerned residents of Cincinnati and I hope that the message is getting through!

The Urban State of Mind: Meditations on the City is the first Urbanophile e-book, featuring provocative essays on the key issues facing our cities, including innovation, talent attraction and brain drain, global soft power, sustainability, economic development, and localism. Included are 28 carefully curated essays out of nearly 1,200 posts in the first seven years of the Urbanophile, plus 9 original pieces. It's great for anyone who cares about our cities.

About the Urbanophile


Aaron M. Renn is an opinion-leading urban analyst, consultant, speaker, and writer on a mission to help America’s cities thrive and find sustainable success in the 21st century.

Full Bio


Please email before connecting with me on LinkedIn if we don't already know each other.



Copyright © 2006-2014 Urbanophile, LLC, All Rights Reserved - Click here for copyright information and disclosures