Thursday, August 12th, 2010

Lessons From Beirut

Update Aug-14: My timing was pretty good here as only two days later Tyler Brûlé writes another column “Behold Brilliant Beirut.” He bought the apartment after all.

While perhaps somewhat overtaken by Baghdad, it has not been uncommon over the years to hear people say, “This place looks like Beirut” when observing some piece or another of urban ruin or destruction. That long war-torn Lebanese capital has perhaps the world’s foremost reputation as being home to perpetual devastation and violence.

But despite, or perhaps because of that, Beirut has managed to capture a hold on the minds of people who come to champion it. Drawing on some of its unique character and long-ago claim to be the “Paris of the Middle East,” Beirut has managed to create a aura about it that has fascinated and attracted many interesting folks.

One of them is Tyler Brûlé, a journalist I’ve mentioned before. He’s a Financial Times columnist and editor of Monocle magazine among other things. He’s been singing Beirut’s praises for years. This year he’s gotten more serious as he took his magazine staff there for summer holidays and even says he’s considering buying a vacation home there. In an FT column called Why Not Put Down Roots in Beirut?, he acknowledges some of the city’s issues:

The last time I was in Beirut I left the city hours before Hezbollah got a bit excitable; and Lebanon had to endure yet another summer of strife….While there’s still enough of old Ashrafieh around to give it a sense of place (the little dry-cleaning shops, the sliver-width news-stands, domestic-staff uniform shops and pockets of 1960s graphic-design brilliance on shop awnings), it’s going fast…..Like most things Lebanese, the flavour of protest is going to need to be a little bit sharper (think, for instance, of the tart, satisfying effect of sumac and lemon in a fattoush salad) to stop the developers from erecting shocking off-the-shelf towerblocks that could just as easily be going up in Sharjah or the suburbs of Istanbul.

Still, he sees the positive as well:

As we drove through the streets of Ashrafieh, it was immediately clear that the cautious behaviour of Lebanon’s banks over the past 24 months had been good, even too good, for the economy: the city is in the middle of a building boom….What I can tell you is that the city is the best place to do a little shopping, sunning and dancing in June. My highlights include…

Now Brûlé’s been looking for a vacation spot for five years, so obviously he’s a bit of a tease. We’ll see if he really decides to man up and, er, pull the trigger.

Over in this month’s Monocle, it is their annual best cities/quality of life survey edition. The list of winners is familiar – Munich, Copenhagen, Zurich – perhaps even familiar enough to signal that it’s time to retire this annual tradition. But one thing they did was to highlight five cities that “may not be the cleanest, safest or most perfectly planned but are still incredibly liveable – if you accept them on their own terms.” These were Istanbul, Naples, Rio, Taipei, and, yes, Beirut.

Monocle notes that the New York Times ranked Beirut #1 out of 44 places to go in 2009 and says of it themselves:

Putting Beirut’s enduring cliches aside, you would be hard pressed to find any other Middle Eastern city bearing graffiti from the Arab Lesbian Liberation Front. And nowhere else could you be eating organic tabbouleh while army tanks rumble past you late at night. Beirut is not about sound urban choices, green architecture, or great public transport. As one friend put it, “buying a Humvee is still considered an ecological choice here.” Yet for all its contradictions, it is still a great place to live, with a palpable sense of freedom, a vibrant creative community and an unabashed will to lead the dolce vita, no matter the political odds.

I read this and immediately thought of Detroit and other struggling cities. These places too fail on any conventional measure of urban success. That might make some believe they’re doomed to failure. And no doubt many places won’t make it. But Beirut shows that it’s possible to find something of success, and what’s more a draw, even in a place that’s been an actual war zone for much of the past three decades.

As a someone from America’s frayed heartland, I particularly enjoy Monocle for this sort of thing. Every single issue there’s a major story of some remote or backwater spot in a corner of the globe you never considered to which all sorts of uber-cool people have moved in search of opportunities, lifestyles, or some other geographic quirk. Monocle is too heavily aligned with the international jet set elite to really take this to its logical conclusion – their resident profiles are too skewed towards designers and other high tone creatives that given these an aura of sameness – but if these places can do it, so can the American Midwest or the north of England or East Germany.

Like in many cities I know personally, I’m sure the pool of such people in these cities is small, but you have to start somewhere – and being able to be a founder, to be a producer and not just a consumer of a new future for these cities, is actually a big part of the attraction. It’s a true and legitimate entrepreneurial activity to move to one of these places.

The lesson of Beirut is that you don’t have to be Munich or Copehagen to carve out your niche – or to attract significant notice. Rather, you can understand who you are, and be authentic and true to yourself, and still create a place with real resonance no matter what the odds against you. There’s no need to travel all the way to the battle zones of Beirut to find it. The frontier opportunity awaits right under our very noses.

Topics: Civic Branding, Urban Culture
Cities: Beirut

4 Responses to “Lessons From Beirut”

  1. Rollie Cole says:


    I have been following your blog ever since you spoke at the Indy Partnership event following a major endorsement by Mark Miles.

    I really agree with much of the Beirut article (and spent 8 years in the Detroit area), but would make two tweaks:

    #1 A GOOD past — through about the 1960’s, I believe, Beirut was an amazing success story, blending past and present in wonderful ways. Detroit’s decade (the 1950’s) of being the fastest-growing, most crowded city in the US is something, but it is NOT the same.

    #2 Geography/weather — a huge percentage of the world, I suspect, would choose a Mediterranean climate (and look how many are moving to southern California, the non-Mediterranean equivalent). Places that do not have this advantage can still be vibrant — most people would NOT pick Chicago, New York, Boston, London, Paris, Madrid for their weather. But good weather really does help, I believe.

  2. Aaron M. Renn says:

    Thanks, Rollie. I appreciate the readership – and I’m overdue for more Indy writing, I realize.

    I agree on both points. Clearly, there’s a legacy of romance to Beirut. I’d check out some of the Monocle pieces on truly remote and inhospitable places for additional data points (or at least anecdote points).

    Of course, while many places can’t match Beirut’s history or climate, most of them aren’t subject to incoming mortar fire either. We’ve obviously got to work with what we’ve got in the communities we live in.

  3. Alon Levy says:

    First, I don’t think the “5 extra cities” list is much to look up to. To call Rio “not the safest” is like to call Einstein “not the stupidest”: the city has a crime rate that would scare Baltimore and Detroit, and police brutality so severe its rate is on a par with the full homicide rate in most American cities.

    Second, more on-topic, I think Detroit is quite different from Beirut, but not because of weather. (Why go to Beirut for the weather when you can get the same thing in Tel Aviv, Istanbul, and Athens?) While both Detroit and Beirut used to have a romance to them, Beirut’s romance was much more appealing to tourists. Detroit’s romance was that it was a strong industrial city; this can’t be repaired without actually having an industrial base, which Detroit no longer has. Beirut’s romance is more aesthetic, which means it can be replicated in tourist zones, which will never get bombed, without actually fixing any underlying problem.

    The irony is that much of the chic in Beirut comes precisely from economic decline. Lebanon’s decline in the last 30 years has led to massive emigration of men to richer Middle Eastern countries, creating a sex ratio biased in favor of women. This has led to a more feminist society, which is why you’ll see that lesbian liberation front graffiti. The social acceptability of Humvee correlates pretty well with poverty or low economic growth being perceived as a larger problem than pollution. (The article I keep procrastinating writing mentions specifically how resource-rich regions tend to maintain the booster mentality for longer, which is why Texas and Alberta accept Humvees more than other rich regions.)

  4. Matthew Kuhl says:

    Thanks for the article and the link to Tyler’s articles.

    Having worked and live in Beirut for nearly the last two years, I have to say the city has a certain appeal, and while a hassle at times, it is always interesting.

    Tyler’s lament about the loss of art moderne and/or the older French Mandate era architecture is truly sad and appears to only be speeding up as more and more money flows into the city. I have personally seen more architectural treasures bite the dust in the last 18 months that had these lost Art Deco/Moderne masterpieces had been located in South Beach Miami and slated for demolition, you would have had celebrities chaining themselves to the buildings in an effort to stop the wrecking balls.

    I do think the writer is overlooking other urbanistic issues that the country has essentially ignored since the end of the war. While the Centre Ville (downtown) is a textbook example of great planning and zoning codes at work, and some of the surrounding districts (namely Ashrafiyeh, where Tyler’s new apartment is located) are also somewhat well preserved, the rest of the city and the surrounding suburbs and sprawl are just downright hideous and as adhoc as the downtown is well planned.

    One other drawback is the lack of modern infrastructure. The power goes out at least 5 times a day during the summer (as a result, everyone has a generator which spews out huge amounts of pollution), and fiber optic networks are almost non-existant outside of the banking industry.

    As I said first off; things are a hassle, However the people are amazingly warm and open (and beautiful), the food is consistently fantastic, and the nightlife is some of the best I’ve ever experienced. I recommend coming and visit before even more of the city is lost and as Tyler suggested, buy some of the endangered properties and keep them out of harm’s way.

The Urban State of Mind: Meditations on the City is the first Urbanophile e-book, featuring provocative essays on the key issues facing our cities, including innovation, talent attraction and brain drain, global soft power, sustainability, economic development, and localism. Included are 28 carefully curated essays out of nearly 1,200 posts in the first seven years of the Urbanophile, plus 9 original pieces. It's great for anyone who cares about our cities.

About the Urbanophile


Aaron M. Renn is an opinion-leading urban analyst, consultant, speaker, and writer on a mission to help America’s cities thrive and find sustainable success in the 21st century.

Full Bio


Please email before connecting with me on LinkedIn if we don't already know each other.



Copyright © 2006-2014 Urbanophile, LLC, All Rights Reserved - Click here for copyright information and disclosures