Search

Tuesday, September 3rd, 2013

Our Jobs Deficit and the Indiana Super City Council by Brian Howey

[ After I put up last week's post on quality of life's impact on economic development, Indiana political blogger Doug Masson pointed me to a column by Brian Howey that makes many related points. Brian publishes a weekly newsletter called Howey Politics Indiana and writes a weekly column that runs in many Indiana newspapers. He graciously gave me permission to repost his most recent column here - Aaron. ]

After 16 consecutive months of Indiana’s jobless rate above the national average – it’s 8.4 percent now, compared to 7.4 for the U.S. – the cold reality is that we have a problem with a quarter of a million Hoosiers chronically out of work.

Then came a Ball State University study showing Indiana’s per capita income has slipped from 30th in the nation to 40th with dozens of counties wallowing in wage levels in the 1990s and, some like my old home of Miami, in the 1970s range.

I wrote an analysis in which I noted that for almost the past nine years, we’ve had Republican governors who have made job creation and education reform top priorities, and yet we’ve been over 8 percent unemployment since early 2009.

At some point, a political reality comes into play, perhaps as early as 2014 and if this trend persists, by 2016. It used to be that a jobless rate over 7 percent would mean the boot from voters. Yet, Gov. Mitch Daniels left office with a 60 percent approval rating and President Obama was reelected.

Gov. Mike Pence gets it. Speaking before the Indianapolis Kiwanis last Friday, he acknowledged, “There’s a great sense of optimism, there’s reason to be encouraged as Hoosiers, but this is a difficult time for too many in our state.”

At Hobart, Pence told local Realtors, “I want to see where the young people can graduate from high school and can have an industry certification or even an associates degree right that day.”

There was one interesting response to my analysis, and it came from Ball State University economics Prof. Michael Hicks. “Indiana’s problem is not that the overall business climate for investment is poor (it is great) or that we have too few students graduating from college with the right degrees (they are) or that people outside Indiana don’t know how great these things are (they know),” he explained. “The problem is not statewide (we have 12 counties growing much faster than the nation as a whole). These are just facts. I also don’t believe that the overall problem is one of rapid technological progress or any of the national (and hopefully transient) problems in labor markets.”

No, the problem here is much closer to home. It comes in your city or town.

Hicks explains: “This is a really a local, not state problem. Almost all our local economic policies target business investment, and masquerade as job creation efforts. We abate taxes, apply TIF’s and woo businesses all over the state, but then the employees who receive middle class wages (say $18 an hour or more) choose the nicest place to live within a 40-mile radius. So, we bring a nice factory to Muncie, and the employees all commute from Noblesville.”

The real problem here is that Indiana Republicans parade under the banners of Reaganism, of smaller government and one that stays out of our bedrooms and personal lives. But when our cities and towns seek what we call “local control” over tax options, legislative leaders politely listen, and then tell them to shove off.

A classic example came last year when Republican and Democratic mayors from Whiting to Evansville pleaded with the General Assembly to toughen laws on access to methamphetamine ingredients. They were largely ignored, a watered down law passed, and so far in 2013, we’ve had almost 1,100 meth lab busts that have injured 17 cookers, 18 cops and involved more than 300 children.

They have passed tax caps that have crimped city budgets. The hope was that municipalities would consolidate, but what’s happened has been cuts in parks budgets and a curtailing of school bus service. So when cities compete for that new corporation, and the executives survey a city with shabby parks and kids walking to school in 10 degree weather, they go elsewhere.

Hicks explains, “As Americans became richer, schooling and community amenities matter more. This is an iron law of economics, that the share of income we spend on some goods rises as we get richer. Education and amenities (like health care and recreation) are two of these things. So, the Midwest built its small towns long before the quality of a place made much difference in migration or incomes. Today, quality of place matters deeply, and we are, in many places, unprepared to deal with it.”

Power has become centralized at the Indiana City Council (i.e. Indiana General Assembly), which has capped taxes, overridden local gun laws and constantly tinkers in municipal affairs.

“Both parties have been complicit to some degree in the long march towards centralizing power at the state and federal level that has weakened the capacity of local government to address their problems,” Hicks explains. “It will take some serious assistance, both technical and financial, for a state like Indiana to help most communities emerge from the dire straits they are in. Even then, many places face a dismal future.”

The ironic aspect to this is that the chronic 8 percent jobless rate may be just the thing that flushes the central scrutinizers in the House and Senate out of office over the next two election cycles.

You reap what you sow, senator, if the voters make this connection.

The columnist publishes at www.howeypolitics.com. Find him on Twitter @hwypol.

6 Comments
Topics: Economic Development, Public Safety, Strategic Planning, Talent Attraction
Cities: Indianapolis

6 Responses to “Our Jobs Deficit and the Indiana Super City Council by Brian Howey”

  1. Chris Barnett says:

    I agree with Mr. Howey. In fact, I’ve been saying the same thing for a long time: we have a tricameral city-county council in Indianapolis. The Council, the state House, and the state Senate.

  2. Paul Wittibschlager says:

    According to my data, Indiana’s unemployment rate was 8.3% in May 2013. This compares to KY (8.1%), TN (8.3%), OH (7.0%), MI (8.4%), PA (7.5%).

    It seems to me that much of the industrial midwest is hovering around the same rate as Indiana, most states are above the National average (7.6% in May 2013). Such is life in the industrial midwest.

    I wouldn’t get to caught up in throwing the bums out until we as a country fully emerge from the last recession. If Indiana does not emerge from the recession at about the same time as MI, KY, OH….then throw the bums out (but its probably not their fault.)

  3. bemclau says:

    Apologies for going political rant-ish.
    But as I see it, most Republicans would view this as a feature, not a bug in their policies. Never to be uttered in public of course, or secretly recorded. ;)
    Consolidate wealth for ‘our’ people, then isolate the lower classes out of sight. Pay lip service to equal opportunity, but in actuality make it tougher and tougher to pull oneself up. Cut funding to inner city services while making it tougher to vote. Cut public school funding while dividing up voting districts. Espouse liberty and freedom while behind the scenes restricting freedom. What better way to marginalize a whole segment of society based on race & class?

  4. Chris Barnett says:

    Paul, the long-term issue in Indiana as a whole is wage stagnation. When you lay that beside the cyclical unemployment problem, it doesn’t look so good in comparison with the rest of the industrial Midwest. Indiana starts to look a whole lot more like Arkansas and Mississippi than like Ohio and Michigan. (Ohio, Michigan, and Pennsylvania have significant shale oil and gas activity. Indiana, not so much.)

    Even I am often guilty of adding “…but our cost of living is low”. But stagnant or falling per-capita income means our standard of living is lower than other places, too.

  5. bemclau, the problem with your analysis is the stunning income inequality in deep blue areas like New York City. There would appear to be plenty of blame to go around. Also, in the case of Indiana, many of the less well off areas would not use their latitude to spend more money as they are among the most conservative regions of the state.

  6. bemclau says:

    One data point doesn’t mean my analysis is wrong, just like it does not prove me right. NYC is the world financial center, it attracts both rich (and very rich) and poor. For that matter, what major city doesn’t have stunning income inequality? McAllen-Edinburg-Pharr Texas has stunning inequality too, and it is in deep red Texas. Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown, NY has less than stunning inequality, is it blue or red? Honolulu has less inequality, it is quite blue. Point being, Gini numbers can be fit into any argument.
    My argument is based on the treatment of cities by Republicans at the state and federal level. You have written about how R’s blow off city voters. Look at how Kasich and Chabot treat Cincinnati. Look at the congressional district lines, disgusting. Chabot doesn’t care about the inner city because his voters in suburban Warren county (94.66% white) don’t care. Brad Wensrup doesn’t care about inner city issues because his voters in Waverly, 100 miles away don’t care. Not only do they not care, they actively work against the city. It becomes a viscious cycle. What incentive do they have to work for anyone other than just their own voters? It is divide and conquer.

The Urban State of Mind: Meditations on the City is the first Urbanophile e-book, featuring provocative essays on the key issues facing our cities, including innovation, talent attraction and brain drain, global soft power, sustainability, economic development, and localism. Included are 28 carefully curated essays out of nearly 1,200 posts in the first seven years of the Urbanophile, plus 9 original pieces. It's great for anyone who cares about our cities.

Telestrian Data Terminal

about

A production of the Urbanophile, Telestrian is the fastest, easiest, and best way to access public data about cities and regions, with totally unique features like the ability to create thematic maps with no technical knowledge and easy to use place to place migration data. It's a great way to support the Urbanophile, but more importantly it can save you tons of time and deliver huge value and capabilities to you and your organization.

Try It For 30 Days Free!

About the Urbanophile

about

Aaron M. Renn is an opinion-leading urban analyst, consultant, speaker, and writer on a mission to help America’s cities thrive and find sustainable success in the 21st century.

Full Bio

Contact

Please email before connecting with me on LinkedIn if we don't already know each other.

 

Copyright © 2006-2014 Urbanophile, LLC, All Rights Reserved - Copyright Information