Tuesday, October 15th, 2013

Cincinnati Tea Party Fails in Campaign to Intimidate the Urbanist Press With Fraud Allegations

It’s not easy being an urbanist blogger in America. For the most part you don’t make any money, but you do accumulate lots of people who don’t like you. Randy Simes, publisher of Urban Cincy, has been a thorn in the side of the local Tea Party for some time. Having suffered a string of defeats trying to derail projects they don’t like, notably the streetcar, both in city elections and in multiple referendums, the Tea Party in the form of Citizens Opposed to Additional Spending and Taxes (COAST) apparently decided that if the couldn’t get what they wanted through democracy, they’d try silencing their critics by filing a vote fraud complaint against streetcar supporter Simes. Fortunately, a bi-partisan majority of the Hamilton County Board of Elections, rejected the allegations.

Simes is a Cincinnati native and graduate of the University of Cincinnati planning school. Like a surprising number of city bloggers in the urbanist space, he actually spent much of his time living outside of Cincinnati for career reasons, first in Atlanta and then in Chicago. His current employer recently sent him on a two-year overseas assignment in Seoul (color me jealous!) Having no historical connection to Chicago nor owning real estate there, he made arrangements to re-establish a residence in Cincinnati by basing himself in a friend’s apartment, and making a deal with his employer to return to their Cincinnati office after his expatriate assignment finished. As part of relocating back to Cincinnati in advance of his assignment, he attempted to get an Ohio driver’s license (which didn’t happen because of problems with vision screening not being available) and registered to vote in Cincinnati. I suspect that if I left the country, I’d do something similar, probably establishing a legal residence with my parents or something since why would I spend two years paying for an apartment I’ll never use in a place where I have no historic connection?

After voting the mayoral primary, the Tea Party pounced. A group called the Ohio Voter Integrity Project filed vote fraud allegations. They describe themselves as non-partisan. However, this group has been linked to the Tea Party backed True the Vote organization by the New Yorker. The attorney representing them in the case, Curt Hartman, is an attorney for COAST. (Simes is far from the only person getting this treatment as Mary Siegel, the member of the Ohio Voter Integrity Project behind the Simes challenges, has also challenged 600 other people’s right to vote as well).

Now Simes has never hidden the fact that he was living in Chicago, so perhaps the Tea Partiers were right in raising a question initially. But upon discovering the facts, they continued to press forward with the case. They scoured Simes’ Facebook and Twitter posts to try to prove he was actually living in Chicago. They tried to subpoena all of his employment records and emails with Travis Estell, the person in whose apartment he is presently based. They asked the Election Board to refer the matter to the county prosecutor, vote fraud being a felony.

Given the politically driven IRS harassment of Tea Party groups by the Obama administration, you’d think they of all people would not agitate for heavy handed government intimidation of others. If so, you thought wrong.

This type of intimidation tactic via vote fraud allegations is hardly limited to victims on urbanist left. This case is eerily similar to a tragic situation in Indiana where Republican Secretary of State Charlie White was convicted of vote fraud and mortgage fraud in a politically motivated prosecution by a Democratic prosecutor appointed after complaints were filed by the Democratic party. White was in the middle of a divorce and having to move as a result, and was staying temporarily with his ex-wife, which is where he registered to vote. Democrats argued that this wasn’t his actual residence – their arguments seemed to suggest there was no place whatsoever where he could have legally voted – and got an aggressive partisan prosecutor to pursue the case.

This seems to be the next frontier in the degradation of American politics. Since as they say any prosecutor can get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich, and since the average American reportedly commits an average of three felonies a day thanks to the mind-numbing quantity of laws we keep churning out, it’s pretty straightforward to use these types of legal tactics to destroy the lives of your political opponents. Since unless there’s a particularly unscrupulous partisan prosecutor who violates the gentleman’s agreement that protects insiders of both parties (as in the case of White), it’s almost certainly going to be the little people and outsiders who are disproportionately the victims. This ironically includes the Tea Party. (For example, long time Indiana Senator Richard Lugar voted for many years from the address of a house he sold decades ago, but you won’t ever see him prosecuted. I’m not saying he should have been, only illustrating that prosecutions are highly selective and targeted).

I have been very fortunate in that while I’ve levied some pretty tough criticisms of various things here over the years, I’ve never experienced any form of retaliation or intimidation in return. Honestly, to my own surprise at times it’s been almost the opposite. Yet this case gives me pause to rethink things as well. Given that even small technical errors in voting cases are felonies, the increasing use of vote fraud allegations as a political weapon by both political wings, and the extreme unlikelihood that my vote will actually matter in an election, I say better safe than sorry. There’s a good chance I simply will allow my registration to lapse and never vote again. I’ll certainly never vote anywhere near anytime I don’t have an ironclad permanent address established for an extended period.

Back to Cincinnati, after a hearing in which election board member Caleb Faux said, “I find this whole proceeding to be extraordinary,” a bi-partisan majority of 3-1 ruled in favor of Simes. The one person who voted against Simes seemed to imply that it was only a matter of timing – registering too early – rather than that his residency was invalid.

Despite this vindication, the Tea Party remains unapologetic and is even attempting to raise the stakes. On Twitter they are now basically saying that if Simes really is a resident, then he’s committed tax fraud:


Bona fide vote and tax fraud are legitimate issues. But let’s not delude ourselves that this has anything to do with justice. It has everything to do with intimidation. In fact, I doubt COAST actually thinks these allegations will stick. I think the real target is getting Simes in hot water with his employer. He works for an engineering firm that has done streetcar-related work, so they are basically saying that Simes advocacy for the streetcar is being done corruptly on behalf of his employer. They claim that the public has been “manipulated by a multi-national corporation” for “years”.

These self-styled geniuses of social media who can purport to track Simes movements such that they know he doesn’t really live in Cincinnati apparently haven’t mastered the art of LinkedIn. Randy Simes hasn’t even worked for his current employer for “years”, having only joined them in 2012 and prior to that actually working for a competitor for nearly five years. His streetcar advocacy far predates the start of his employment. Here’s but one small example from 2010. Who’s being dishonest now, COAST?

In any case, trying to drag his employer through the mud can’t help Simes’ career prospects there, so this tactic is sadly likely to work. Given that the vast majority of the urbanist press has to rely to other employment to pay the bills, trying to create negative publicity (even if the employer is not directly implicated) that imperils one’s career is clearly an effective tactic, and one that could easily be used against urbanist bloggers almost anywhere.

As a Chicagoan once noted, “politics ain’t beanbag.” Like it or not the urbanist press is involved in politics, so I’d advise people to be buckled up as there very well could be choppy waters ahead.

7 Comments
Topics: Urban Culture
Cities: Cincinnati

7 Responses to “Cincinnati Tea Party Fails in Campaign to Intimidate the Urbanist Press With Fraud Allegations”

  1. John M (Indy) says:

    There are some rather embarrassing falsehoods in your discussion of the Charlie White case. First, the case was prosecuted by two special prosecutors: Republican John Dowd (formerly the prosecutor of Warren County) and Democrat Dan Sigler (former Adams County prosecutor). Setting aside the issue of whether Sigler, a Democrat who won elective office in a county where Mitt Romney won 70 percent of the vote is a partisan firebrand, you simply are dead wrong about how the prosecution was handled. Further, the two were appointed by Hamilton County judge Steve Nation, also a Republican. White was convicted by a jury of his peers in Hamilton County, which as you know is a heavily Republican county with a well-educated jury pool. Also, the problem with White’s defense is that his cell phone records demonstrated that he did not actually live with his ex-wife. Since many of your readers don’t live in Indiana it’s important for them to realize that White’s defense was that he did not actually live in the condo that he owned and where his fiance lived, but in fact lived in his ex-wife’s basement while his fiance lived alone. His cell phone records showed that he was lying. Had White admitted that he lived in the condo he owned, then he would have been ineligible to hold his Fishers Town Council seat (i.e., he did not live in the district he represented). Certainly, the initial complaint against White was politically motivated, but it was far from baseless. The notion of partisan Democrats ramming a politically motivated prosecution through the Hamilton County judiciary is truly absurd.

    There is something ironic about a post complaining about baseless allegations that then makes serious accusations of professional conduct on the basis of vague information and false premises.

  2. Matthew Hall says:

    Aaron is completely right about the motives of Randy’s attackers. Chris Wetterich certainly sacrificed any claim to journalistic objectivity as well.

    It’s a local version of the hostage taking in D.C. The burning hatred of Cincinnati by the coasters is just amazing to me. They truly have no idea how the world really works today and are left to share their fevered imaginings in their virtual isolation chambers. They’re tragic figures who see no future for themselves. Maybe they are right that they have no future, but their lashing out at those who do have a vision for the future is beneath contempt.

  3. KerryH says:

    COAST is nothing more than an organization created by parasitic attorneys masquerading as tea party types. They have a long history in Cincinnati of feeding off Cincinnati city government coffers by litigating every possible thing both large and small they disagree with. The irony is that by pressing so many lawsuits (most of them frivolous)against the city they cost the citizens of Cincinnati hundred of thousands of dollars in additional attorney fees, etc. Quite ironic for an organization masquerading as people concerned about taxes and spending. COAST is fond of saying they take no funds from government in these lawsuits and all proceeds go to attorney fees. Yes, of course all proceeds go to attorneys fees. The head people of COAST are attorneys. This is an organization that is hypocritical in the extreme.

  4. Quimbob says:

    From CO ‘s perspective,”This is how the game is played.”
    Their amorality is appalling.

    http://coast-usa.blogspot.com/2013/09/connecting-dots-on-cincinnati-streetcar.html

  5. Jon says:

    Ironically, this city case has strong parallels to the federal events of late. If the tea party can’t get its way, they are willing to do everyone and everything harm. These people are complete scum.

  6. James says:

    This reminds me of the old post on why cities don’t vote Republican.

  7. Jake Mecklenborg says:

    The Cincinnati mainstream media enables COAST. It’s a mix of shills and people who just plain don’t get it. They have the power to make this group go away, but instead they pander to them, and I suspect are even paid by their puppet masters.

    Unfortunately they appear to have paid off their most prominent critic, WCPO.com’s Kevin Osborne, who for years tracked their activity. But about six months ago he changed his stripes was responsible for the most sensational anti-Randy Simes piece to have appeared in the past two weeks.

    Your comment about day jobs is an important one — not only will they attack your employer, they will attack any business or any rental property you own.

The Urban State of Mind: Meditations on the City is the first Urbanophile e-book, featuring provocative essays on the key issues facing our cities, including innovation, talent attraction and brain drain, global soft power, sustainability, economic development, and localism. Included are 28 carefully curated essays out of nearly 1,200 posts in the first seven years of the Urbanophile, plus 9 original pieces. It's great for anyone who cares about our cities.

About the Urbanophile

about

Aaron M. Renn is an opinion-leading urban analyst, consultant, speaker, and writer on a mission to help America’s cities thrive and find sustainable success in the 21st century.

Full Bio

Contact

Please email before connecting with me on LinkedIn if we don't already know each other.

 

Copyright © 2006-2014 Urbanophile, LLC, All Rights Reserved - Click here for copyright information and disclosures