Why I Like INDOT Better Every Day
I would never make it in politics. My opinions on most topics are
too strong and I am not ashamed of voicing them loudly. Anyone
that has read through many of my transportation pages knows that one
of the topics I have strong opinions on is transportation. Often,
this has led me to be critical of various highway and transit
agencies.
One of the primary targets of my ire has been the Indiana Department of
Transportation (INDOT). It is proposing many major road
projects that I disagree with and I have not backed down in stating my
disagreements. But this can give the impression that I hate INDOT
when I in fact do not. I actually am very pleased with a lot of
things INDOT is doing.
Just yesterday I started thinking a bit about all the changes I
have seen in INDOT over the last 15-20 years and how much things have
improved at that agency. When I started organizing my thoughts, I
realized they deserved their own web page.
Anyone who has been driving Indiana's roads in the last ten years
knows the major improvements that have occurred. I believe a lot of
this is due to changes at INDOT. Here are a few of the major
improvements I have seen:
- Back in the 1970's and 1980's, Indiana's roads were in terrible
shape. I remember that along some stretches of interstate, the
pavement in the right lane was in such bad shape I (or in the time
before I was old enough to drive, my father) was almost forced to
drive in the left. But from the late 1980's forward, INDOT has done a
great job of improving the quality of roads in the state. Very little
of the interstate system is still in poor condition (and there are
programmed projects to improve those). Many surface arterials have
been resurfaced or otherwise upgraded. There has definitely been a
turnaround in road conditions in this state and INDOT deserves a lot
of the credit.
- Not only have pavement conditions have gotten better, so has the
overall quality of the roadway design. In years past, INDOT would
resurface a road by simply removing the old asphalt surface and
applying a new one. Now when INDOT does an interstate rehabilitation,
it replaces bridge decks (and widens them when necessary to provide
full shoulders), upgrades the roadways shoulders, replaces all road
signs, etc. There has also been a trend away from simple
rehabilitation of some the worst pavement stretches towards a complete
roadway reconstruction. This emphasis on quality has been noticed
nationally. INDOT just won a prestigious national quality award for
the I-65 reconstruction on the north side of Indianapolis and was a
runner up in 1995 for a similar rehab of I-465 on the South Side.
- There is now much more thought put into the asethetics of roadway
design. In the past, INDOT seemed to consider roads a purely
utilitarian device. It did not seem to realize or care that major
roads have a large impact on the visual environment of the state.
Recently though, INDOT has implemented several projects that have
really raised the bar in terms of creating attractive roadways. It is
still not quite to the level of some other states, but INDOT is
improving rapidly in this area.
- INDOT changed its policies on sidewalk installation along state
roads. The former policy was not to include any sidewalks on any
state road project unless an existing sidewalk was replaced during
reconstruction or unless the local government where the road ran
requested and paid for the sidewalks. Now INDOT has a policy
in place that allows them to add sidewalks to state roads when they
feel it is warranted. Many miles of sidewalks have been installed
during road projects as a result of this policy change.
- There has also been a new focus on multi-modalism. That is,
creating an integrated surface transportation system out of Indiana's
rail, road, public transit, pedestrian, and bicycle facilities. Part
of this came as a result of a federal mandate. But INDOT also
reorganized to make it happen. In previous years, INDOT was focused
on non-highway transportation while a separate state agency - the
Department of Highways - took care of the roads. Now all state
transportation agencies are under one departmental umbrella, and INDOT
is taking multi-modalism seriously.
- The role of the public in transportation projects and planning is
greater than ever. There have been a number of projects that have
actually had substantive changes made to them as a result of public
comments. The amount of openness INDOT has towards the public is
amazing. INDOT people have provided me with all the documentation and
information I have ever requested without complaint or stonewalling.
Often they have also spent a good amount of time discussing various
projects with me. INDOT is demonstrating the way government should
behave towards its citizens.
Here are a few examples of various specific projects where the
"new" INDOT has done a great job:
- Borman Expressway Upgrades - INDOT has embarked on an
ambitious plan to improve all of the interchanges and overhead bridge
structures on the Borman. The interchanges at Calumet Ave.,
Indianapolis Bvld., and Kennedy Ave. have been completely redesigned
and reconstructed. A $90 million project at Cline Ave. is planned,
and INDOT is also marching further eastward with several other planned
interchange and bridge projects. This is a vital first step towards
widening what is one of the busiest roads in the state because nearly
all of the original overhead bridge structures are too narrow to
accommodate any additional travel lanes. All of the new bridges
provide much greater horizontal clearance.
- Southeast I-465 Reconstruction Project - 30 years of
traffic and harsh Indiana winters have taken their toll on the
southeast quadrant of I-465. Dilapidated pavement and substandard
interchanges greet motorists as they drive through this area. INDOT
could have just done some minor patching and slapped down a new coat
of asphalt. Instead, it developed at $110+ million project to
completely replace the pavement and interchanges. This project will
create an essentially brand new roadway designed to modern standards.
I have a large section of my Indianapolis major investment projects page devoted to
this excellent proposal. The project will be constructed from 1999 to
2001.
- I-65/SR 46 Interchange - Columbus is a city blessed with
great architecture. When INDOT reconstructed the main interchange
serving Columbus, they showed great sensitivity to this heritage with
an interesting new design. The basic design was an urban single
point. In order to provide the necessary clearance for all of the
ramps to come together at a single point under I-65, INDOT leaned two
steel arches together and cantilevered the I-65 bridge decks off of
it. The arches extend to a goodly height above I-65, and provide an
interesting display for passing motorists to enjoy. I have seen
several advertisements for Columbus related items that are already
using this interchange as a reference landmark and symbol of the city.
- West 56th St. Bridge Replacement - The state replaced and
widened this bridge from two to four lanes. Pretty standard, but they
also included both a sidewalk and extra wide bicycle path across the
bridge, and did a number of things to make this look better than your
average overpass. I like the project so much that I wrote a letter to the commissioner of INDOT
letting him know how much I liked it.
- I-69/82nd St. Interchange Modification - This $3 million
project probably provided more bang for the buck than any other state
road project I can remember. 82nd St. was widened under I-465 to six
through lanes. Plus, all ramps were widened, providing dual turn
lanes in all directions. But not only was the capacity of the
interchange improved, INDOT included sidewalks in the project, and
used attractive stone work for a retaining wall along the I-69 bridge
abutments. This was yet another project I liked so well that I wrote
a letter to the commissioner of
INDOT telling him how much I liked it.
- I-465/Michigan Rd. Interchange Modification - INDOT
added an upgrade to this interchange to its proposal to widen Michigan
Rd. north of I-465. This was after a public hearing on the project
where large numbers of citizens expressed their concerns about this
interchange. Also, INDOT added some sidwalks at the north end of the
road widening project in response to public comment. This goes to
show that INDOT is now taking public feedback seriously in the design
of its roadway projects.
There are still a lot of improvements I think INDOT needs to make.
But it has made a tremendous amount of progress, which is impressive
for a state bureaucracy. On the whole, my main request for future
improvement would simply be "more, more, more". I would like to see
many of the principles I outlined above be integrated into all INDOT's
projects. Till that day comes, I will probably continue to be just as
critical about things I do not like as I am not. (Hopefully I will
remember to be just as vocal about praising the things I do like).
But at the rate INDOT is making progress, hopefully it will not be too
far in the future when I will find myself with little to complain about.
Copyright © 1998 Aaron M. Renn
(arenn@urbanophile.com)
All Rights Reserved
Back to my transportation page or up to my
homepage.
Just Say No to Frames, Ads, and Animated GIF's